.png)
The truth about website speed and why it matters
Everyone wants a fast website. But not everyone understands what “fast” really means.
Speed isn’t just a technical metric. It’s a business one. A slow website doesn’t just frustrate users, it costs sales, trust, and visibility. Studies show that even a one-second delay can reduce conversions by up to 7 percent. On mobile, that impact is even sharper.
That’s why the “Webflow vs WordPress” speed debate keeps coming up. Business owners want to know which platform will actually perform better in the real world, not just in developer theory.
The truth is, both platforms can be fast or slow, depending on how they are built. But one of them makes speed easier by design.
Why speed matters to your bottom line
A fast site isn’t just about ticking a box for Google’s Core Web Vitals. It’s about three key business outcomes:
- Sales: Faster pages mean less drop-off and more completed checkouts.
- Trust: A smooth, snappy site signals professionalism and reliability.
- Visibility: Google ranks faster sites higher, especially on mobile.
If your website takes too long to load, users won’t wait, they’ll leave. And they rarely come back.
Speed directly affects:
- Bounce rate: Every extra second increases the chance of users leaving.
- Conversion rate: Faster load times build confidence and reduce hesitation.
- SEO performance: Page speed is now a measurable ranking factor.
Slow websites are like leaky buckets. You can keep pouring money into ads, SEO, and content, but the conversions slip right through the cracks.
Key Tip: The fastest website isn’t always the one with the fastest code
It’s easy to assume speed is all about technical build quality. But in reality, the biggest slowdowns come from human decisions, not code.
Bloated designs, oversized images, too many plug-ins, unoptimised videos, these are the culprits. The platform plays a role, but process and discipline matter more.
That’s why Webflow often has an advantage. It builds speed into the workflow. WordPress, on the other hand, requires constant management to stay fast.
How Webflow approaches speed
Webflow was built with modern performance standards in mind. It’s not a CMS that’s been patched and re-patched over time. Everything about its infrastructure is designed to deliver content fast, globally, and reliably.
Here’s why it generally runs faster out of the box:
1. Global hosting on AWS and Fastly
Webflow sites are hosted on the same infrastructure trusted by Netflix, Slack, and Dropbox. Content is distributed across a global CDN (content delivery network), so your site loads from the closest server to the user. That alone can shave seconds off load times.
2. No plug-in bloat
WordPress relies heavily on third-party plug-ins. Each one adds scripts, styling, and load time. Webflow’s native features, animations, forms, CMS collections, SEO controls, remove the need for many of those add-ons.
3. Optimised publishing
Every time you publish in Webflow, the platform minifies your code, compresses assets, and bundles files efficiently. That means you’re not relying on extra optimisation plug-ins to clean things up.
4. Built-in lazy loading and modern image formats
Webflow automatically serves images in next-gen formats like WebP and delays loading off-screen content until it’s needed. It’s like having a performance engineer built into your CMS.
How WordPress approaches speed
WordPress can absolutely be fast, but it requires constant optimisation and maintenance.
By default, WordPress wasn’t built for speed. It’s open-source, flexible, and powerful, but its architecture depends on plug-ins and manual upkeep.
Here’s what slows it down:
1. Heavy reliance on plug-ins
Caching, SEO, security, forms, sliders, page builders, analytics, each plug-in adds scripts, requests, and processing time. Even well-optimised sites can end up juggling 20 or more plug-ins.
2. Cheap hosting
Many WordPress sites sit on low-cost shared hosting that simply isn’t built for modern performance. Unless you upgrade to premium managed hosting (like Kinsta or WP Engine), you’ll hit speed bottlenecks.
3. Outdated themes and bloated code
Generic multipurpose themes load far more code than most websites need. They’re designed to work for everyone, which means you’re carrying a lot of unnecessary weight.
4. Manual optimisation
Minifying files, compressing images, setting up CDN delivery, and managing cache layers often require technical know-how or extra costs for managed services.
In short, WordPress can match Webflow’s speed, but only with the right hosting, the right plug-ins, and the right developer constantly monitoring it.
Real-world example: Same design, different results
An Auckland retailer ran a test comparing two identical landing pages — one built in Webflow, one in WordPress. Both used the same copy, layout, and images.
Results:
- Webflow version loaded fully in 1.4 seconds.
- WordPress version (with caching plug-ins and CDN enabled) loaded in 2.7 seconds.
- The Webflow version scored 98 on Google PageSpeed Insights. The WordPress version scored 82.
That 1.3-second difference translated into a measurable impact. The faster page saw a 12 percent higher click-through rate on its call-to-action.
No extra marketing. No redesign. Just better performance.
Common misconceptions
“WordPress is slower because it’s old.”
Not quite. WordPress can be very fast with the right setup. The challenge is that it’s built for flexibility, not performance-first simplicity. You have to work to make it fast.
“Webflow is only for small sites.”
Webflow handles everything from startup landing pages to enterprise websites with thousands of CMS items. The difference is that you’re not managing plug-ins or server settings to keep it running.
“Hosting doesn’t matter.”
Hosting is the single biggest variable in WordPress performance. Cheap hosting can undo all your optimisation work. Webflow removes that variable entirely by including world-class hosting in every plan.
The hidden cost of “cheap but flexible”
Many businesses choose WordPress because it seems cheaper upfront. The problem is that performance costs show up later — in maintenance, updates, and lost conversions.
Example: A service company in Wellington paid $12k for a WordPress build. Within six months, they were spending $500 a month on fixes, hosting upgrades, and plug-in conflicts. By year two, their “affordable” website had cost $24k — more than a comparable Webflow build would have cost up front.
In website performance, low-cost setups often end up being the most expensive.
How to evaluate speed before you build
You don’t need to be technical to make a smart call about website performance. Here’s what to ask your agency or developer:
1. How will this site be hosted?
Ask about CDN networks, load balancing, and backup systems. If they can’t explain it in simple terms, that’s a red flag.
2. How are images and media optimised?
Ensure they’re compressed automatically and delivered in modern formats like WebP.
3. How will performance be monitored after launch?
You should get access to reports or dashboards that show speed, uptime, and SEO performance.
4. What are your Core Web Vitals targets?
If they don’t have benchmarks, they’re not measuring what matters.
When WordPress might still make sense
While Webflow often wins on speed, WordPress still has its place. If your site requires advanced custom logic, unique integrations, or long-form publishing at scale, WordPress can be a better fit.
It’s open-source, meaning you can build almost anything with the right resources. But if you value simplicity, low maintenance, and built-in performance, Webflow is likely the smarter choice.
In short:
- Choose Webflow if you want performance and control without constant updates.
- Choose WordPress if you have in-house developers and need deep customisation.
Addressing common objections
“Can’t we just speed up our WordPress site?”
Yes, but it takes consistent effort. You’ll need ongoing caching, image compression, database cleanup, and regular plug-in audits.
“Isn’t Webflow more expensive?”
The monthly cost might look higher, but there’s no hosting, plug-in, or maintenance overhead. Over two to three years, Webflow usually costs less overall.
“Will Google rank my Webflow site differently?”
No. Both platforms can achieve strong SEO results. The key difference is that Webflow makes technical SEO setup easier to get right from the start.
What to do now: A quick checklist
✅ Run your current site through Google PageSpeed Insights or GTmetrix.
✅ Ask your agency how your hosting affects performance.
✅ Audit plug-ins or apps, remove what you don’t need.
✅ Test load times from mobile networks, not just office Wi-Fi.
✅ Consider migrating to a platform with built-in speed optimisation if you spend too much time fixing performance issues.
Final word
Website performance is not just about milliseconds, it is about money.
If your site takes four seconds to load and your competitor’s takes two, you are losing potential sales every single day. The faster, simpler, and more reliable your site is, the more confidently customers engage with your brand.
Both WordPress and Webflow can deliver strong results. The difference lies in how much ongoing work it takes to keep them fast.
If you want a website that performs beautifully without the constant maintenance struggle, Webflow gives you the advantage of speed that scales with your business.
